Investigating Psychostasis: The Regulatory Foundations of Psychology
The Psychostasis Research Institute is an independent research programme investigating psychostasis — the psychological system’s equivalent of homeostasis. Just as physiological systems maintain stability through regulatory processes, we investigate whether psychological systems do the same, and what exactly they regulate.
903/50 Clarence St
Sydney, NSW 2000
info@psychostasis.org
+61 2 9999 9999
Monday – Friday
9:00am – 5:00pm
Welcome to the…
The Psychostasis Research Institute
The Psychostasis Research Institute is an independent research organisation investigating psychostasis — the hypothesised regulatory foundation of psychological life. Just as homeostasis describes how physiological systems maintain viability, psychostasis asks whether psychological systems are organised around an equivalent regulatory process, and if so, what exactly that process regulates. The programme is committed to a regulatory model of psychology but has not committed to a specific answer. Identifying what psychostasis is — and building testable theories around it — is the programme’s central purpose.
The Institute was founded in response to a growing fragmentation within psychological science, where robust local findings often lack a shared framework for integration, comparison, and cumulative progress. The Confidence in Durable Alignment Model (CDAM) is the programme’s current leading proposal — one attempt to define what psychostasis is and how it operates. But the programme is not closed to alternatives. It welcomes proposals that attempt to identify what psychological systems regulate and build testable theories around that answer.
Our work is dedicated to investigating what psychostasis is, testing proposed models against evidence, and refining those models through empirical engagement. The current leading model, CDAM, proposes specific mechanisms — but the programme’s commitment is to the question, not to any single answer.
Key Domains of Psychological Regulation
The programme’s core commitment is to a regulatory model of psychology — the view that these domains are not independent systems but expressions of an underlying regulatory process. Understanding how that process operates is the central challenge.
Attention
The allocation of cognitive resources toward information most relevant to anticipated regulatory challenge.
Motivation
The regulatory system’s attempt to structure action toward restoring or preserving future regulatory viability.
Decision Making
Choice behavior emerging from comparative evaluations of regulatory cost, risk, and long-term viability.
Behaviour
Observable action as the execution layer of regulatory strategies selected under constraint.
Identity
The stabilised narrative and strategy set through which regulation is maintained across time and context.
Affect
Regulatory signals reflecting alignment or mismatch between future demand and capacity.
Our Commitment
Empirical Falsifiability Through Mechanistic Specification
The Psychostasis Research Institute was established to advance psychological science through a research programme that is explicit enough to be tested, challenged, and, where necessary, redirected. The programme operates in the Lakatosian sense: it is healthy as long as its models keep producing new predictions that can fail, and would be degenerative if revisions stopped generating new predictions and started just absorbing old failures. The programme welcomes not just tests of its current models, but alternative proposals about what psychostasis is.
We are committed to developing frameworks in which psychological claims are grounded in clearly specified regulatory mechanisms, rather than broad descriptions or post hoc interpretation. By identifying explicit assumptions, processes, and predicted failure points, the Institute prioritises empirical falsifiability and long-horizon usefulness over rapid adoption or rhetorical coherence, while maintaining respect for the extensive body of work that precedes it.
We actively invite critical and adversarial collaboration from researchers who are sceptical of our assumptions, methods, or conclusions. PRI treats rigorous challenge as a core methodological requirement and welcomes engagement designed to test, refine, or falsify its models through transparent debate and empirical investigation.